Summary
This short post illustrates, using oscilloscope captures, why a requirement exists to include a snubber, such as diode, across a driven (externally modulated) Piezo buzzer element. Unsuppressed Circuit
In the schematic below using a Kingstate Piezo buzzer, the snubber component usually in parallel with the Piezo buzzer was omitted.
Unsuppressed Piezo Buzzer |
Component S1 Drain Voltage Unsuppressed |
Piezo manufacturers usually state that a resistor, diode, Transorb or similar device should be placed in parallel with the buzzer to manage any energy created by the piezoelectric effect.
Component S1 Drain Voltage Suppressed |
Diode Suppressed Piezo Buzzer |
Suppressed Circuit - Resistor
In some Piezo manufacturer datasheets, suppression is achieved with the use of a resistor. A resistor may be a cheaper solution to snubbing although the value of the resistor should be selected carefully.
Shown below is a capture, performed in the same manner as the previous section, using a 1K resistor in parallel with the Piezo buzzer. The resistor value was selected because it appeared to be a common value shown on posts and forums. Unfortunately the resistance is far too high and voltages in excess of the supply rails are still developed in the circuit.
Resistor 1K Suppressed Piezo Buzzer |
Resistor 100R Suppressed Piezo Buzzer |
For any device requiring electronic suppression, being prudent with the type of suppression can provide considerable differences in the result. The captures in this post were applicable to an externally modulated Piezoelectric element with suppression fitted in parallel with the Piezo.
You may also check this article in EDN
ReplyDeletehttps://www.edn.com/increase-piezoelectric-transducer-acoustic-output-with-a-simple-circuit/
/odissey1
Hi Odissey1
ReplyDeleteCertainly for a Piezo transducer a driven voltage to 100 V would be ideal. In this post, the driven element was a Piezo buzzer where high voltages in the circuit were being minimised.
Greg